Time to shift investor climate action narrative ?
A report published by the London School of Economics argues for a fundamental transition from a market-led narrative to a policy-led narrative regarding investor involvement…
-
-
Strategic influence: How shareholder engagement on nature risks impacts corporate behavior
Companies experiencing nature-related investor engagement perceive these interactions as value-generating and as a driver of corporate strategic change, a report on…
-
Can Canada monetize its safe country branding to attract (Sustainable) investments?
Canada’s Infrastructure Plans The investment virtuous cycle Canada has ambitious plans to rebuild its defense, housing, and energy infrastructures while strengthening…
-
Negative media coverage is top deterrent for responsible investment growth in Canada
Negative media coverage from other juridictions are seen as the top responsible investment growth deterrent by Canadian asset managers and asset…
-
Canadian government climate commitment meets ‘greenium’ fatigue
The mobilization of capital through sovereign green bonds is part of Canada’s financing strategy to achieve national climate objectives. But convincing…
-
1 in 5 Canadian advisors who don’t offer responsible investment say it’s not their role
Canada’s Responsible Investment Association’s 2025 Advisor RI Insights Study reveals a notable increase in advisors who feel that it is not…
-
How to navigate ESG communications
Many companies are moving to silence their efforts around environmental, social and governance matters. But greenhushing can be as bad as…
-
Stewardship influence when ESG collaboration fragments: How can asset managers adapt communications?
Asset managers are pulling out of coalitions like NZAM and Climate Action 100+, leaving a transparency gap. Legal pressure, client demands, and independence have all driven exits. Now, firms are going solo on climate engagement. The challenge: how do they keep influence without collective action?
